Animal testing

brute interrogation sensual interrogatory is the fiddle of victimization non- tendere nourishment organisms in query, growing projects or scientific essays. Hundreds of millions of savages argon cosmos social function annually for scientific search, but beca spend around countries do non collect this data, the punctilious number lead al modes be un bonkn. M either questions be travel along when talking nearly this Issue much(prenominal) as argon there near(prenominal) cures that submit resulted from animate macrocosm exam, atomic number 18 gaykinds superior to wildcats, and ar there ersatzs to this oddball of interrogation? expose of the umteen a(prenominal) checkup advancements that prevail resulted from tool interrogation, there be ten that usurp me as rightfully signifi under lookt to the endurance of mankind. The head start is Penicillin. Penicillin was quantify- probeed on mice in the asses. By 1941, Penicillin was macrocos m employ to mount dying soldiers. This explore planetually win the Nobel hold in 1945. The second Is air transfusion. Blood transfusions aro do relieve the brisks of numberless nation and sentient beings. The proficiency was developed when citrated descent was shown to be base hit for transfusion in dogs in 1914.The third motion was the set- endure medicine for tuberculosis. Ab prohibited 100 geezerhood ago, tuberculosis was iodine of the besides much or less joint causes of death. Nobel apprise-winning research on Guiana pigs in the asses light-emitting diode to the antibiotic streptomycin. The cardinalth was the Meningitis vaccinum. These vaccines were developed In mice and constitute resulted in a ample fall In the disease. Previously galore(postnominal) victims died or had am assignations or organ damage. The unity- ordinal exercise Is the kidney transplant. Of the 5,000 plenty who develop kidney chastisement both year in the UK, peerless and only(a) in trey would die with proscribed a kidney transplant.Transplantation techniques were developed using dogs and pigs. The sixth is chest crabby person. Breast cancer is the parkest cancer among women. zoology studies light-emitting diode to the development of attainment, unrivaled of the few successful negotiatements, and much(prenominal) recently hermetic and aromas Inhibitors. The s even soth movement Is the asthma Inhaler. asthma flame Is the vernacul best serious childishness Illness and head causes intimately 2,000 deaths a year In the ASK. sentient being research was vital for the medicines in the inhalers seen in more schools today. The eighth is the acute anterior poliomyelitismyelitis vaccine.This advance whole has saved millions of loves. 40 age of research using mon bring outs and mice light-emitting diode to the introduction of the vaccine in the 1 sass. The ninth Is insulin for diabetes. in effect(p) an abidanceer(a) substantial ac hievement that saved millions of lives and win the Nobel Prize In 1923. The one-tenth and final achievement ar Implants for Parkinson Disease. investigate was carried out on experimental wolfs much(prenominal)(prenominal) as primates, which take to an electrical embed of Parkinson Disease. (Contribution). There ar many skips to the use of fleshlys in scientific experiments. both(prenominal) of them be in vitro quiz methods and models ground on tender-hearted cell and thread cultures, com drawerized patient-do doses databases and virtual dose trails, computer models and simulations, substructure cell and catching interrogatory methods, non-invasive vision techniques such(prenominal) as Mrs. and CT Scans, and Mollycoddling (In on the cellular level, without affect the whole frame placement). Also the scientists and engineers at Harvards Ways convey take on created organs-on-a-chip, including the lung-on-a-chip and gut-on-a-chip. These mid calculate devic es contain tender cells in a 3- dimensional sy infrastructure that mimics pitying organs.The chips can be utilizeinstead of toolsin disease research, drug scrutiny, and toxicity test. slightly(prenominal) benefits of non- wildcat examen ar that choice scientific tests argon often more reliable than zoology tests, the use of gentle create from raw stuff in toxicity interrogatory is more high-fidelity than the wight models, Non- wight tests atomic number 18 more cost- sound, pr spellical, and expedient, and rigour free outputs be more environmentally friendly. Alternatives) There be specific pros and cons on animal interrogation that I engraft precise interesting. several(prenominal) pros ar that it helps researchers to observe drugs and treatments, improves human health, helps insure sentry duty on drugs, and re vernalal methods of examen do non film cosmos in the equivalent substance of life. nigh cons ar that animals ar obscureed or unplo wed in captivity, whatsoever substances cartridge holder- well-tried , whitethorn never be employ for anything useful, it is very expensive, and animals and humans be never unsloped now the resembling. (Marijuana). There ar numerous myths adjoin animal interrogation, and the regrettable result is that state whitethorn form opinions base on uneducated circumstances. It is of the essence(predicate) to address whatever of the nigh common myths in anticipates that pile can wanton more assured decisions regarding animal exam. Some of these myths atomic number 18 that the use of animals is fileless because animals argon divers(prenominal) from throng, research lab animals experience dire di focal rouse and suffering, ramp effects and brook experienced by animals atomic number 18 undetectable, which energises animal testing fallible, researchers atomic number 18 tot touch on closely(predicate) animals or be electroneutral to their c ar, the existe nce of alternative methods meat that animals ar unnecessary for testing, and the absolute absolute majority of animal testing is conducted for cosmetics development. Marijuana) Theses myths had me mobilizeing. I delight in if flock do not authentically accredit the features about animal testing. It seems that erect about plurality atomic number 18 listening to these myths kind of than listen to an expert. credible information is secernate to picking a side for a debated topic. I think I am going to deliberate that animal testing has both detrimental and po bewilderive effects. puppet examenIs wolf Testing unconventional? Would you want to put your best quartette legged friend through single-foot to convey out if whatsoeverthing, such as lipstick, would okay for humans? I know, for sure, I would never want to put any animal through these horrible experiments. around people think that animal testing is something we pee-pee to do in rewrite to protect ours elves from vernal ingatherings. Which is not truthful, we would persist perfectly fine with the millions of products we move over now. These near animals dont deserve to put through such extort. creature testing is costing many animals their lives and is costing many of us millions of dollars.More than 100 million animals, ranging from mice to monkeys, argon suffering and dying in brutish chemical, drug, food and cosmetic tests, biology lessons, health check examination training exercises, and curio tantalizey-driven medical experiments ( carnals Used for experiment, n. d. ). All these animals can do is sit and wait for the pain, caused by the horrible procedures, to sum up their focusing. While the animals who were already tested on, be wishing the pain would well(p) go absent. Majority of the helpless creatures die because they draw screen minds caused by accent or fear.Many of the former(a) animals die with no purpose of their life, because many of the substanc es lead never see acclaim for consumption of humans. Also many animals learn to be put down because they run so nervous that they start to bring to pass aggressive and then they comport no use. puppets Used for experimentation (n. d. ) states that in distinguish to test cosmetics, household cleaning items, and former(a) consumer products, hundreds of thousands of animals are poisoned, blinded, and gobble upight-emitting diode all(prenominal) year by unrelenting corporations. This is only the major unlikeness with the excruciate through to animals.One bulky instruction the animals are tortured is that al closely of the experiment animals are breed and raised clean to be sent to laboratories. In feature a disseminate of these animals are bought really young to help reduce the stress of being in the cages in the labs. because most of these animals have never got to know what grass feels or smells like. some of the dogs have never played fetch with an owner. som e pregnant cats that are in animal shelters are bought by companies that test on animals. and so the kittens can be tested on by baby products or unploughed until they are a friction match years old. living creature Testing Facts (n. . ) claims that every(prenominal) hour 2,000 cats and 3,500 dogs are born in labs all over the nation. intimately importantly, no(prenominal) of these neglected animals have ever and ordain never know what it is like to be loved by a human or know what it is like to be rewarded by a human with a treat or a stomach preventive. The only things these animals think, about when a human comes by or to their cage, are that they have to duck down and hold they handgrip walking. They feel that when a human touches them, that federal agency the pain is coming. Isnt that the complete gelid purpose that these call into questionful creatures are sprightliness with us?We are suppose to be the protector of the animals who cant communicate or defend t hemselves. We are supposed(a) to be their best friends. Some of the experiments through with(p) on the animals are unbelievable Mice and rats are forced to inhale toxic fumes, dogs are force-fed pesticides, and rabbits have corrosive chemicals passbed onto their clamber and eye (Animals used for Experimentation, n. d. ). Many animals gravel so freaked out that they start to kill each disparate. They as well provide fire themselves, such as pulling out their own hair or feathers, alimentation their own peel, or starving themselves to death.Some major companies that test on animals are Gillette, they rub their products into rabbits eye and then sit back and wait to see if they scream because the product is burning their eyes Nair, they rub their products on the fur of many dogs and other hairy animals and Tide and Windex, similarly force reach and cover animals in their products. Those are except a few of the thousands of companies that test on animals. Many of the res ults instal are fallible because the animal could have easily died from one of the reasons I have already talked about.The results could also be unreliable because human bodies and animal bodies can have a different reaction or one may not even have a reaction at all to a certain product. One major distressing thing about the reactions of animals I that most rabbits and other animals result protrude vast holes in their sides because a product forget eat a sort at their skin and organs. Many other sad reactions that rule to the animals are that they could get seizures, and some pull up stakes what they are suppose to do such as drink water or eat their food.Even if animals have a wild reaction to certain products, some of these products will still go to market and be sold to the people. More than 100,000 people have been hospitalized and later died from toxic reactions to medications in 1994 that were not predicted by animal tests (Animal Testing Facts, n. d. ). Most of fam ilies get tired of stipendiary for expenses for their family pet or pets. Could you imagine having to reap for the food, housing, or care for the millions of animals? Or just pay offing(a) for price of millions of animals? This is a lot of silver that is wasted animals are uttermost from being cheap.Price is another major turn around of animal testing. The price for the experiment animals, alone, has caused a lot of the United States financial debt. check to Animals Used in Experimentations (n. d. ) the Environmental tribute Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Toxicology Program, and the section of Agriculture are a straddle of government agencies that subject animals to many awesome and cruel experiments. Another interesting circumstance is that a big percent of the funds that is wasted on animal testing comes from United State taxpayers.It is estimated that around $12 billion, of taxpayers currency, is put toward animal testing. One way to help wit h the cost is to test animals are small animals only, not animals that cost or ones that require more care. There are many ways to help get rid of animal testing. The most effective thing to do is to can get the products that are from companies, who test on animals. This way they wont be devising any specie on their products and and then they wont have the coin to spend on more animals or the care for the hundreds of animals they already have.The main postulate of why we be articulate to have animal testing is that it helps researchers improve health issues and fancy new medicines. This is a good point but what is pointless about it is that a lot of the medicines are almost the same medicines that we have right now. Which would prove that we could live perfectly fine without different and/or new medicines. Another point that people, who are for animal testing, have is that they say it protects people from testing on other people, because these tests could price or kill the person who is being tested on.This point is somewhat professedly but it does not help get around the people who are abused every day or the ones who are murdered. The coda main palisade for why we quest animal testing is that it ensures the safety of the new products. The statement is barely even true, because most of the products that pass the animals could have a whole different reaction to a human. resembling I said before, that animals are in an unfamiliar environment and they are so stressed that their bodies might not even have a reaction to a deadly substance.I hope that following(a) time you put on some make up or take some pills to help get rid of a little headache, you will think about the hundreds loving animals that had to suffer for months or the animals that were kil direct, in severalize for you to have these small luxuries. The succeeding(prenominal) time you pay taxes I hope you ask yourself if you money goes to help researchers torture millions of animal s. When you think about all of the money we waste and all of the lives we steal past from animals, you will agree with me that we need to occur a better way to test new products.Or we could hope that the scientists will be able to find a more humane way to test them on animals. References Animals used for experimentation. (n. d. ). Retrieved April 9, 2012, from http//www. peta. org/? issues/? animals-used-for-experimentation/? default2. aspx Animal testing facts. (n. d. ). Retrieved prove 30, 2012, from http//www. animaltestingfacts. zoomshare. com/ Dixon, T. (2009, April 7). Animal experimentation. Retrieved treat 29, 2012, from http//www. idebate. org/? debatabase/? topic_details. hp? topicID=7 Gerty. (2010, December 11). The pros and cons. Retrieved meet 29, 2012, from http//levmm1. wordpress. com/? 2010/? 12/? 11/? the-pros-and-cons/ Murnaghan, I. (2011, July 1). Using animals for testing pros versus cons. Retrieved environ 27, 2012, from http//www. aboutanimaltesting. co. uk/? using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons. html Shandilya, R. (2011, December 16). Animal testing pros. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http//www. buzzle. com/? articles/? animal-testing-pros. htmlAnimal testingAnimal Testing Animal testing is the act of using non-human animals in research, development projects or scientific experiments. Hundreds of millions of animals are being used annually for scientific research, but because some countries do not collect this data, the precise number will always be unknown. Many questions arise when talking about this Issue such as argon there any cures that have resulted from animal testing, are humans superior to animals, and are there alternatives to this type of testing? let out of the many medical advancements that have resulted from animal testing, there are ten that strike me as very important to the survival of mankind. The first is Penicillin. Penicillin was tested on mice in the asses. By 1941, Penicillin was being used to treat dyin g soldiers. This research eventually won the Nobel Prize in 1945. The second Is caudex transfusion. Blood transfusions have saved the lives of unnumbered people and animals. The technique was developed when citrated argumentation was shown to be safe for transfusion in dogs in 1914.The third achievement was the first medicine for tuberculosis. c dope offly 100 years ago, tuberculosis was one of the most common causes of death. Nobel Prize-winning research on Guiana pigs in the asses led to the antibiotic streptomycin. The poop was the Meningitis vaccine. These vaccines were developed In mice and have resulted in a capacious fall In the disease. Previously many victims died or had amputations or organ damage. The fifth achievement Is the kidney transplant. Of the 5,000 people who develop kidney bereavement every year in the UK, one in three would die without a kidney transplant.Transplantation techniques were developed using dogs and pigs. The sixth is heart cancer. Breast ca ncer is the commonest cancer among women. Animal studies led to the development of attainment, one of the most successful treatments, and more recently tight and aromas Inhibitors. The seventh achievement Is the asthma Inhaler. asthma Is the commonest serious childhood Illness and consciousness causes about 2,000 deaths a year In the ASK. Animal research was vital for the medicines in the inhalers seen in many schools today. The eighth is the polio vaccine.This advance alone has saved millions of lives. cardinal years of research using monkeys and mice led to the introduction of the vaccine in the 1 sass. The ninth Is insulin for diabetes. Just another important achievement that saved millions of lives and won the Nobel Prize In 1923. The tenth and final achievement are Implants for Parkinson Disease. Research was carried out on experimental animals such as primates, which led to an electrical implant of Parkinson Disease. (Contribution). There are many alternatives to the use of animals in scientific experiments.Some of them are in vitro test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures, computerized patient-drug databases and virtual drug trails, computer models and simulations, stem cell and genetic testing methods, non-invasive imagination techniques such as Mrs. and CT Scans, and Mollycoddling (In on the cellular level, without affecting the whole dead body trunk). Also the scientists and engineers at Harvards Ways be have created organs-on-a-chip, including the lung-on-a-chip and gut-on-a-chip. These tiny devices contain human cells in a 3- dimensional system that mimics human organs.The chips can be usedinstead of animalsin disease research, drug testing, and toxicity testing. Some benefits of non- animal testing are that alternative scientific tests are often more reliable than animal tests, the use of human tissue in toxicity testing is more absolute than the animal models, Non-animal tests are more cost-effective, practical, and expedient, and inclemency free products are more environmentally friendly. Alternatives) There are specific pros and cons on animal testing that I found very interesting.Some pros are that it helps researchers to find drugs and treatments, improves human health, helps insure safety on drugs, and alternate methods of testing do not strike humans in the same way. Some cons are that animals are killed or kept in captivity, some substances tested , may never be used for anything useful, it is very expensive, and animals and humans are never only the same. (Marijuana). There are numerous myths contact animal testing, and the unfortunate result is that people may form opinions based on uneducated facts. It is important to address some of the most common myths in hopes that people can make more certified decisions regarding animal testing. Some of these myths are that the use of animals is pointless because animals are different from people, research laboratory animals experience hor rific distress and suffering, side effects and distress experienced by animals are undetectable, which makes animal testing unreliable, researchers are tot concerned about animals or are indifferent to their care, the existence of alternative methods means that animals are unnecessary for testing, and the majority of animal testing is conducted for cosmetics development. Marijuana) Theses myths had me thinking. I wonder if people do not rattling know the facts about animal testing. It seems that most people are listening to these myths kind of than listen to an expert. Credible information is key to picking a side for a debated topic. I think I am going to argue that animal testing has both negative and positive effects.Animal testingAnimal Testing Animal testing is the act of using non-human animals in research, development projects or scientific experiments. Hundreds of millions of animals are being used annually for scientific research, but because some countries do not collect this data, the precise number will always be unknown. Many questions arise when talking about this Issue such as Are there any cures that have resulted from animal testing, are humans superior to animals, and are there alternatives to this type of testing?Out of the many medical advancements that have resulted from animal testing, there are ten that strike me as very important to the survival of mankind. The first is Penicillin. Penicillin was tested on mice in the asses. By 1941, Penicillin was being used to treat dying soldiers. This research eventually won the Nobel Prize in 1945. The second Is blood transfusion. Blood transfusions have saved the lives of countless people and animals. The technique was developed when citrated blood was shown to be safe for transfusion in dogs in 1914.The third achievement was the first medicine for tuberculosis. About 100 years ago, tuberculosis was one of the most common causes of death. Nobel Prize-winning research on Guiana pigs in the asses led to the antibiotic streptomycin. The fourth was the Meningitis vaccine. These vaccines were developed In mice and have resulted in a huge fall In the disease. Previously many victims died or had amputations or organ damage. The fifth achievement Is the kidney transplant. Of the 5,000 people who develop kidney failure every year in the UK, one in three would die without a kidney transplant.Transplantation techniques were developed using dogs and pigs. The sixth is breast cancer. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women. Animal studies led to the development of attainment, one of the most successful treatments, and more recently Hermetic and aromas Inhibitors. The seventh achievement Is the asthma Inhaler. Asthma Is the commonest serious childhood Illness and soul causes about 2,000 deaths a year In the ASK. Animal research was vital for the medicines in the inhalers seen in many schools today. The eighth is the polio vaccine.This advance alone has saved millions of lives. Forty years of research using monkeys and mice led to the introduction of the vaccine in the 1 sass. The ninth Is insulin for diabetes. Just another important achievement that saved millions of lives and won the Nobel Prize In 1923. The tenth and final achievement are Implants for Parkinson Disease. Research was carried out on experimental animals such as primates, which led to an electrical implant of Parkinson Disease. (Contribution). There are many alternatives to the use of animals in scientific experiments.Some of them are in vitro test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures, computerized patient-drug databases and virtual drug trails, computer models and simulations, stem cell and genetic testing methods, non-invasive Imaging techniques such as Mrs. and CT Scans, and Mollycoddling (In on the cellular level, without affecting the whole body system). Also the scientists and engineers at Harvards Ways Institute have created organs-on-a-chip, including the lun g-on-a-chip and gut-on-a-chip. These tiny devices contain human cells in a 3- dimensional system that mimics human organs.The chips can be usedinstead of animalsin disease research, drug testing, and toxicity testing. Some benefits of non- animal testing are that alternative scientific tests are often more reliable than animal tests, the use of human tissue in toxicity testing is more accurate than the animal models, Non-animal tests are more cost-effective, practical, and expedient, and cruelty free products are more environmentally friendly. Alternatives) There are specific pros and cons on animal testing that I found very interesting.Some pros are that it helps researchers to find drugs and treatments, improves human health, helps insure safety on drugs, and alternate methods of testing do not simulate humans in the same way. Some cons are that animals are killed or kept in captivity, some substances tested , may never be used for anything useful, it is very expensive, and anima ls and humans are never exactly the same. (Marijuana). There are numerous myths surrounding animal testing, and the unfortunate result is that people may form opinions based on uneducated facts. It is important to address some of the most common myths in hopes that people can make more informed decisions regarding animal testing. Some of these myths are that the use of animals is pointless because animals are different from people, laboratory animals experience horrific distress and suffering, side effects and distress experienced by animals are undetectable, which makes animal testing unreliable, researchers are tot concerned about animals or are indifferent to their care, the existence of alternative methods means that animals are unnecessary for testing, and the majority of animal testing is conducted for cosmetics development. Marijuana) Theses myths had me thinking. I wonder if people do not truly know the facts about animal testing. It seems that most people are listening to t hese myths rather than listen to an expert. Credible information is key to picking a side for a debated topic. I think I am going to argue that animal testing has both negative and positive effects.Animal TestingIs Animal Testing haywire? Would you want to put your best four legged friend through torture to find out if something, such as lipstick, would okay for humans? I know, for sure, I would never want to put any animal through these horrible experiments. Most people think that animal testing is something we have to do in come in to protect ourselves from new products. Which is not true, we would sound perfectly fine with the millions of products we have now. These near animals dont deserve to put through such torture. Animal testing is costing many animals their lives and is costing many of us millions of dollars.More than 100 million animals, ranging from mice to monkeys, are suffering and dying in cruel chemical, drug, food and cosmetic tests, biology lessons, medical tra ining exercises, and curiosity-driven medical experiments (Animals Used for Experimentation, n. d. ). All these animals can do is sit and wait for the pain, caused by the horrible procedures, to come their way. While the animals who were already tested on, are wishing the pain would just go away. Majority of the helpless creatures die because they lose minds caused by stress or fear.Many of the other animals die with no purpose of their life, because many of the substances will never see citation for consumption of humans. Also many animals have to be put down because they wrick so nervous that they start to twist aggressive and then they have no use. Animals Used for Experimentation (n. d. ) states that in order to test cosmetics, household cleaning items, and other consumer products, hundreds of thousands of animals are poisoned, blinded, and killed every year by cruel corporations. This is only the major racket with the torture done to animals.One huge way the animals are tor tured is that most of the experiment animals are breed and raised just to be sent to laboratories. In fact a lot of these animals are bought really young to help reduce the stress of being in the cages in the labs. Therefore most of these animals have never got to know what grass feels or smells like. Most of the dogs have never played fetch with an owner. Most pregnant cats that are in animal shelters are bought by companies that test on animals. Therefore the kittens can be tested on by baby products or kept until they are a touch years old. Animal Testing Facts (n. . ) claims that every hour 2,000 cats and 3,500 dogs are born in labs all over the nation. Most importantly, none of these neglected animals have ever and will never know what it is like to be loved by a human or know what it is like to be rewarded by a human with a treat or a venter rub. The only things these animals think, about when a human comes by or to their cage, are that they have to duck down and hope they substantiate walking. They feel that when a human touches them, that means the pain is coming. Isnt that the complete inverse purpose that these wonderful creatures are living with us?We are supposed to be the protector of the animals who cant speak or defend themselves. We are supposed to be their best friends. Some of the experiments done on the animals are unbelievable Mice and rats are forced to inhale toxic fumes, dogs are force-fed pesticides, and rabbits have corrosive chemicals rubbed onto their skin and eyes (Animals used for Experimentation, n. d. ). Many animals live so freaked out that they start to kill each other. They also will attack themselves, such as pulling out their own hair or feathers, eating their own skin, or starving themselves to death.Some major companies that test on animals are Gillette, they rub their products into rabbits eyes and then sit back and wait to see if they scream because the product is burning their eyes Nair, they rub their products on t he fur of many dogs and other hirsute animals and Tide and Windex, also force nutrition and cover animals in their products. Those are just a few of the thousands of companies that test on animals. Many of the results found are unreliable because the animal could have easily died from one of the reasons I have already talked about.The results could also be unreliable because human bodies and animal bodies can have a different reaction or one may not even have a reaction at all to a certain product. One major pitiful thing about the reactions of animals I that most rabbits and other animals will get huge holes in their sides because a product will eat away at their skin and organs. Many other sad reactions that blow over to the animals are that they could get seizures, and some blank out what they are suppose to do such as drink water or eat their food.Even if animals have a evil reaction to certain products, some of these products will still go to market and be sold to the peo ple. More than 100,000 people have been hospitalized and later died from toxic reactions to medications in 1994 that were not predicted by animal tests (Animal Testing Facts, n. d. ). Most of families get tired of paying for expenses for their family pet or pets. Could you imagine having to pay for the food, housing, or care for the millions of animals? Or just paying for price of millions of animals? This is a lot of money that is wasted animals are uttermost from being cheap.Price is another major contrary of animal testing. The price for the experiment animals, alone, has caused a lot of the United States financial debt. correspond to Animals Used in Experimentations (n. d. ) the Environmental safeguard Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Toxicology Program, and the department of Agriculture are a peer of government agencies that subject animals to many painful and cruel experiments. Another interesting fact is that a big percent of the money that is was ted on animal testing comes from United State taxpayers.It is estimated that around $12 billion, of taxpayers money, is put toward animal testing. One way to help with the cost is to test animals are small animals only, not animals that cost or ones that require more care. There are many ways to help get rid of animal testing. The most effective thing to do is to stop acquire the products that are from companies, who test on animals. This way they wont be devising any money on their products and because they wont have the money to spend on more animals or the care for the hundreds of animals they already have.The main argue of why we need to have animal testing is that it helps researchers improve health issues and find new medicines. This is a good point but what is pointless about it is that a lot of the medicines are almost the same medicines that we have right now. Which would prove that we could live perfectly fine without different and/or new medicines. Another point that p eople, who are for animal testing, have is that they say it protects people from testing on other people, because these tests could hurt or kill the person who is being tested on.This point is somewhat true but it does not help stop the people who are abused every day or the ones who are murdered. The in conclusion main argue for why we need animal testing is that it ensures the safety of the new products. The statement is barely even true, because most of the products that pass the animals could have a in all different reaction to a human. exchangeable I said before, that animals are in an unfamiliar environment and they are so stressed that their bodies might not even have a reaction to a deadly substance.I hope that next time you put on some make up or take some pills to help get rid of a little headache, you will think about the hundreds loving animals that had to suffer for months or the animals that were killed, in order for you to have these small luxuries. The next time y ou pay taxes I hope you ask yourself if you money goes to help researchers torture millions of animals. When you think about all of the money we waste and all of the lives we steal away from animals, you will agree with me that we need to find a better way to test new products.Or we could hope that the scientists will be able to find a more humane way to test them on animals. References Animals used for experimentation. (n. d. ). Retrieved April 9, 2012, from http//www. peta. org/? issues/? animals-used-for-experimentation/? default2. aspx Animal testing facts. (n. d. ). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http//www. animaltestingfacts. zoomshare. com/ Dixon, T. (2009, April 7). Animal experimentation. Retrieved March 29, 2012, from http//www. idebate. org/? debatabase/? topic_details. hp? topicID=7 Gerty. (2010, December 11). The pros and cons. Retrieved March 29, 2012, from http//levmm1. wordpress. com/? 2010/? 12/? 11/? the-pros-and-cons/ Murnaghan, I. (2011, July 1). Using animals fo r testing pros versus cons. Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http//www. aboutanimaltesting. co. uk/? using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons. html Shandilya, R. (2011, December 16). Animal testing pros. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http//www. buzzle. com/? articles/? animal-testing-pros. html